A claim before a narrative
The exact wording, author, date and context are fixed before interpretation begins.
Research and public data
For reporters, analysts and researchers: the Center's method, standards, archive summary and public data for further work with the original context.
Published records
0
Fact checks
0
Named sources
0
Latest publication
–
0Bulletins
0Video releases
0Short updates
0Analysis
English research data is not available yet
Methods and interface are available in English. Archive aggregates are published here only after an English case dataset has been editorially reviewed.
Open the Russian research view
1
What supports the method
The Center checks the claim, source provenance and media file, and states uncertainty clearly. No single technical signal is proof.
Evidence hierarchy
Primary documents and direct data take priority; independent sources are used for corroboration.
Provenance is not truth
Metadata and Content Credentials can describe origin and edits, but cannot prove that a depicted event is truthful.
Uncertainty remains visible
Unsupported, contradicted and still unknown elements are recorded separately instead of being collapsed into a score.
Research question → method → boundary
Question
Method and output
What it does not prove
What kind of information disorder is this?Separate falsity, intent and harm; record misinformation, disinformation or malinformation as analytical context.Intent without evidence or a factual result by itself.
Where did the claim come from?Compare the source with independent materials, publication dates and archive copies.That a reputable source is infallible.
Was the media altered or taken out of context?Metadata, reverse search, keyframes, visual consistency and provenance credentials.Truth from metadata alone; missing credentials are not proof of manipulation.
Is there a coordinated tactic or recurring pattern?Map observable tactics with DISARM vocabulary; compare timing, channels, wording and amplification.Actor attribution or coordination from similarity alone.
Reference standards and handbooks
IFCN Code of PrinciplesTransparency, sources and corrections
EFCSN Code of StandardsEvidence-based public-interest fact-checking
DISARM FrameworkA common language for influence-operation tactics
C2PATechnical provenance and authenticity standard
UNESCO handbookJournalism, verification and information disorder
Verification HandbookPractical verification of user-generated content
Information DisorderCouncil of Europe framework for falsity, intent and harm
Debunking Handbook 2020Research consensus on correcting misinformation
2
What the public archive contains
These totals cover published records in the selected language. A video may also belong to an editorial type; result totals include checks only.
- Active months
- 0
- Per active month
- 0
- Latest 30 archive days
- 0
- Latest 90 archive days
- 0
Recent periods are counted backwards from the latest publication in this language, making the summary reproducible.
Compare recent 30 and 90 day windows with active months before calling a topic “growing”.
Format and result counts show archive structure; evidence coverage shows how easily a record can be checked again.
When reusing CSV, JSON or API records, preserve the permanent URL, result wording, publication date and stated limitations.
Publication dynamics
No dated publications are available yet.
Check results
Language coverage
- Қазақша
- 120
- Русский
- 88
3
Related open data and registries
External resources add context; they are not Center results. Check jurisdiction, collection method, language coverage and update date before drawing conclusions.
Google Fact Check Tools APISearch published ClaimReview recordsCoverage depends on participating publishers and markup quality.
GDELTGlobal news events and knowledge graphsMedia visibility is not public opinion or factual accuracy.
DISARMStructured tactics of information manipulationA taxonomy supports comparison, not attribution by itself.
Internet ArchiveHistorical copies of public web pagesAbsence from the archive is not proof that a page never existed.
Common CrawlLarge-scale historical web corpusCrawl coverage is selective and requires reproducible query methods.
EUvsDisinfo databaseDocumented disinformation cases and narrativesInstitutional scope and regional focus must be stated when reused.
4
What makes a check reviewable
A published result is useful when a reader can see its original wording, source material and stated limits without guessing what is missing.
The original claim
The wording being checked is stated precisely enough to compare it with the source.
Primary sources
Links and documents make the route to the underlying evidence visible.
Limits of the conclusion
Uncertainty, missing context and unanswered questions are stated separately from the conclusion.
5
Use the data in your own work
Open the summary, download publication records or use the public interface. When citing a record, preserve its permanent URL, result wording, date and stated limitations.